Wealth planning

Capital Gains Tax: is paying some tax now a good plan for the future?

Jonathan Brownlow looks at how paying a low rate of capital gains tax could be of benefit in the long run

22/08/2017

Jonathan Brownlow

Jonathan Brownlow

Wealth Planner

It could be argued that a capital gains tax (CGT) liability is a nice problem to have. It means that the value of an investment has increased and a profit has been made upon it being sold. The gain needs to be at least £11,300 in the current tax year (2017/2018) before tax is payable, as an annual exemption is available to all UK resident individuals.

There are some exceptions where no CGT is chargeable, such as gains on an individual’s primary residence, holdings in ISAs or on the sale of gilts. For all other assets CGT is charged on the gain after exemptions and allowances.

Since the 6th April 2016, CGT for non-residential property has been charged at 10% for basic rate taxpayers or 20% for higher rate taxpayers; second homes and investment properties are taxed at 18% or 28% respectively (the old rates). Trustees and personal representatives always pay CGT at the higher rate.

Planning considerations

Investment income and gains are taxed in different ways and there is a long-standing disparity between the rates of income tax and capital gains tax.

As plans were being made to start the recovery after the global financial crisis there was speculation that CGT rates might increase from a single rate of 18% in order to address this difference and also generate more tax revenue. No change materialised in the 2009 Budget or in the March Budget of 2010.

Unusually, the top rate of CGT was eventually changed mid-year in George Osborne’s first Budget, shortly after the General Election in 2010. The rate payable by higher and additional rate taxpayers was increased to 28%, effective from midnight on the day of the announcement. This created additional complexity when calculating how much tax was due that year, as the rate applicable to any taxable gain was determined by the date it was realised. The immediacy of the rate increase also left no time to plan for the change.

We live in uncertain times, both politically and fiscally, and we know that the forthcoming Autumn Budget will be when any fiscal changes will most likely be announced. We have therefore started to consider whether the rate disparity between income tax and CGT will continue and whether or not the current low rates of CGT present an opportunity.

Many of our clients, who are long-term investors, are holding assets that stand to make significant taxable gains if sold. A decision to retain the investment may be taken based upon a positive outlook for the investment or it could simply be that there is a reluctance to trigger a tax liability upon the sale, hence it is retained. If it is the latter, then disposing of those assets would potentially mean paying some tax now. But whilst rates appear to be as low as they are anticipated to go, could crystallising those gains be an appropriate course of action for some in order to free up the capital for other uses?

Funds could then be reinvested to better meet objectives that may have changed substantially over the time the investment has been held. For example, moving from a growth strategy to one that prioritises the minimisation of inheritance tax (which charges 40% to capital as opposed to CGT taking 20% on just the gain) to restructure investments to improve tax efficiency over the longer term which could also have a greater overall tax impact.

We would therefore encourage a review of your circumstances to consider whether changes could, or should, be made to portfolios to take advantage of the current, historically low rates of CGT.  Whilst electing to bring forward a tax liability might feel counterintuitive at the first look, upon further consideration it might actually present a good opportunity for some to improve their longer term position.

Author

Jonathan Brownlow

Jonathan Brownlow

Wealth Planner

Jonathan joined in 2016 and is a Wealth Planner, providing advice to clients on pension and tax planning issues. Previously he has worked at RBC, HSBC, and a privately owned wealth management firm specialising in advice to financial services professionals. Jonathan has 14 years’ experience, is a Fellow of the Personal Finance Society and a Chartered Financial Planner.

This article is issued by Cazenove Capital which is part of the Schroders Group and a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited, 12 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6DA. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. 

Nothing in this document should be deemed to constitute the provision of financial, investment or other professional advice in any way. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of an investment and the income from it may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount originally invested.

This document may include forward-looking statements that are based upon our current opinions, expectations and projections. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements.

All data contained within this document is sourced from Cazenove Capital unless otherwise stated.

Contact Cazenove Capital

To discuss your wealth management requirements, or to find out more about our services and how we can help you, please contact:

John Gordon

John Gordon

Business Development Director
Telephone:
john@cazenovecapital.com
James Gladstone

James Gladstone

Head of Wealth Planning
Telephone:
james@cazenovecapital.com