Investing sustainably: five myths debunked
Myth 1: Sustainable investing is just avoiding “sin stocks”
The phrase “sin stocks” emerged to describe firms linked to industries perceived by some to be unethical, such as tobacco, alcohol or gambling.
Such funds will exclude these stocks, or screen them out. But each investor has views on what is and isn’t ethical, as the results of the Schroders Global Investor Study, published recently, demonstrates. See the full results on our website.
Rather than merely screening out certain stocks, sustainable investing is about closely evaluating a range of environmental, social and governance issues, known as ESG. This could be analysing a company’s track record on pollution from its factories, or how socially responsible it is in the communities it operates.
On corporate governance issues, it is a matter of judging how well the interests of shareholders, customers and staff are managed.
Put simply, well managed companies that care about the sustainability of the world in which they operate should have a better long-term future.
Sustainable investment is really about integrating ESG considerations into the investment decision-making process, with a view to enhancing returns.
Myth 2: Returns will be hit if you invest sustainably
Isn’t there a cost to investing with a sustainably? There is mounting evidence to the contrary.
Studies by Friede, Busch & Bassen (2015) and Morgan Stanley to name but two, found that companies focused on ESG had, on average, enhanced financial performance.
A study by Empirical Research, which has been evaluating and monitoring 60 ESG factors since November 2014 for US stocks, found that those companies with better ESG scores outperformed those with lower.
By examining ESG issues investors gain a better understanding of not just what companies do but how they do it.
ESG analysis puts companies into a wider global context, and helps to identify which ones have the most resilient models.
Investors can choose investments based on moral beliefs and personal values, but that would be ethical investing rather than sustainable investing.
Myth 3: It’s all about Green Investment
It would be easy to assume that the “E” of ESG dominates the other two. Most of the thematic investment funds focus on environmental issues, from water shortage to new environmental technologies.
And environmental issues, especially in the wake of the COP 21 Climate Change talks in Paris last year are high up on investors’ minds. However, social and governance issues are of increasing importance.
Rising inequality and strapped governments has led to the introduction of Living Wages in a number of regions, putting pressure on costs.
Changing consumer tastes and new regulation has seen the introduction of sugar taxes and ongoing declines in sugary drink consumptions. CEO pay and boards are rarely out of the headlines.
Successful ESG investment processes take a holistic look at the changing world companies have to navigate, and assess the performance of their investment across a number of factors.
They engage where performance is lacking, pushing companies to improve their performance in ESG factors across the board accepting the need for continual improvement in these areas.
Myth 4: It only works in the most developed markets
The bulk of ESG data that we have is disclosed by large companies operating in developed markets. This does not mean that ESG considerations are not pressing for those in emerging markets.
A 2013 report by UBS, analysing the World Economic Forum (WEF) Corporate Governance Index and emerging market equities valuations, concluded that companies that score well on governance are valued more highly and have lower volatility.
Evaluating how companies manage stakeholders, and environmental and social change, is relevant whatever the market. With emerging markets, it may just take more digging.
Myth 5: It only works for stocks
We tend to think mostly about equities, but it doesn’t end there. With bonds, for instance,
ESG analysis helps identify risks to a borrower’s ability and willingness to repay debts.
Put simply, a well managed company should be less likely to stumble into value-destroying disasters and be better positioned to repay investors who lend them money.
Investments do not operate in a vacuum; global industries face social, economic, environmental and industrial changes on a larger scale and faster pace than ever before.
The gap between the values of companies on the right or wrong sides of those trends may grow ever-wider as a result. By investing in sustainable businesses, investors may increase their chances of success.
The opinions contained herein are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the house view. This document is intended to be for information purposes only. The material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The material is not intended to provide, and should not be relied on for, accounting, legal or tax advice, or investment recommendations. Information herein is believed to be reliable but Cazenove Capital Management does not warrant its completeness or accuracy. No responsibility can be accepted for errors of fact or opinion. This does not exclude or restrict any duty or liability that Cazenove Capital Management has to its customers under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (as amended from time to time) or any other regulatory system.
Cazenove Capital Management is a trading name of Schroder & Co. Limited 12 Moorgate, London, EC2R 6DA. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority.
For your security, communications may be taped and monitored.